RACIALLY MOTIVATED SUMMONS DISMISSED
RACIALLY MOTIVATED SUMMONS DISMISSED
Hon. Judge Donald Bogosian
Municipal Judge, New Providence, NJ. Sep. 15, 2005 (10.15 P.M.)
RE: SPRINGFIELD TRANSFER CASE RACIALLY MOTIVATED SUMMONS #
K-047616 NO PARKING 2-6 A. M. ISSUED BY SPRINGFIELD POLICE ON
JULY 20, 05 BY BEING PREJUCICED, INTIMIDATING & COMMUNAL
Honorable Judge Donald Bogosian dismissed the racially motivated Summons # K-047616 against the ill-conceived, ill-motivated, illegal opposition/ protests & misrepresentation of Public Prosecutor Robert Thelander appearing on behalf of the corrupt/communal Springfield Police Chief/Officer. I was representing myself on my own. Honorable Judge upheld my rights to my defense and he further stated that I am entitled to the information requested from the Springfield Police.
Hon. Judge: Mr. Makkar do you feel you have been singled out?
Makkar: Yes Sir.
Hon. Judge: To the Prosecutor Thelander why I was not provided with the
Specific information requested on Aug. 30,2005?
Prosecutor: He asked for carte blanche things and that was turned by you. Well
the only one I got here was the one that was on Sep. 12th which is what, 3 days ago and here we are at trial. (he had replied to 8-30-05 request)
Judge: I am talking about the letter he wrote to the chief of police on Aug. 30th
requesting information from the police department. And what the court had
denied is a number of Subpoenas. Clearly from the tenor of the defendant’s
letters back and forth, it appears that he believes that there was selective
enforcement. Am I correct Sir (To Makkar)?
Makkar: Yes, Sir.
Judge: Since the defendant has raised the issue of selective enforcement and since I think it is important that he have the information available to him, that
since it wasn’t provided and I have no reasonable explanation as to why it wasn’t provided, the court is strongly considering to dismiss the summons. The court did not deny his right to receive certain information to prepare his defense of the ticket. As a result court is dismissing the Complaint.
cc: Hon. Peter Harvey, A.G. NJ (corruption/racism by Springfield Adm. 609 292 3508
Ms. Agudosi, Head Bias Crimes, A.G. Office. Fax: 609 219 6595
Col. Joseph Fuentes, Superintendent, State Police. 609 771 1496
Hon. Mayor & Council Members of Springfield. Fax: 973 912 0538
Devendra Makkar as per the Court Transcript received 10-18-05
Hon. Judge Donald Bogosian
Municipal Judge, New Providence, NJ. Sep. 15, 2005 (10.15 P.M.)
RE: SPRINGFIELD TRANSFER CASE RACIALLY MOTIVATED SUMMONS #
K-047616 NO PARKING 2-6 A. M. ISSUED BY SPRINGFIELD POLICE ON
JULY 20, 05 BY BEING PREJUCICED, INTIMIDATING & COMMUNAL
Honorable Judge Donald Bogosian dismissed the racially motivated Summons # K-047616 against the ill-conceived, ill-motivated, illegal opposition/ protests & misrepresentation of Public Prosecutor Robert Thelander appearing on behalf of the corrupt/communal Springfield Police Chief/Officer. I was representing myself on my own. Honorable Judge upheld my rights to my defense and he further stated that I am entitled to the information requested from the Springfield Police.
Hon. Judge: Mr. Makkar do you feel you have been singled out?
Makkar: Yes Sir.
Hon. Judge: To the Prosecutor Thelander why I was not provided with the
Specific information requested on Aug. 30,2005?
Prosecutor: He asked for carte blanche things and that was turned by you. Well
the only one I got here was the one that was on Sep. 12th which is what, 3 days ago and here we are at trial. (he had replied to 8-30-05 request)
Judge: I am talking about the letter he wrote to the chief of police on Aug. 30th
requesting information from the police department. And what the court had
denied is a number of Subpoenas. Clearly from the tenor of the defendant’s
letters back and forth, it appears that he believes that there was selective
enforcement. Am I correct Sir (To Makkar)?
Makkar: Yes, Sir.
Judge: Since the defendant has raised the issue of selective enforcement and since I think it is important that he have the information available to him, that
since it wasn’t provided and I have no reasonable explanation as to why it wasn’t provided, the court is strongly considering to dismiss the summons. The court did not deny his right to receive certain information to prepare his defense of the ticket. As a result court is dismissing the Complaint.
cc: Hon. Peter Harvey, A.G. NJ (corruption/racism by Springfield Adm. 609 292 3508
Ms. Agudosi, Head Bias Crimes, A.G. Office. Fax: 609 219 6595
Col. Joseph Fuentes, Superintendent, State Police. 609 771 1496
Hon. Mayor & Council Members of Springfield. Fax: 973 912 0538
Devendra Makkar as per the Court Transcript received 10-18-05
posted by Citizens For Democracy at 3:11 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home